A unified guide to writing clear, adaptable prompts and choosing the right prompting approach for every task in Rocket.
Goal: Create a screen where users can book a consultation call.
Rocket parses prompts instantly. Extra words don’t help - it’s clarity that counts.
Prompting out of sequence often leads to unexpected layouts or confusing flows.
Don’t leave details up to interpretation. The more precisely you describe the behavior, the more accurate the output.
Being too general makes it harder for Rocket to know what to prioritize - layout, logic, or both.
Great prompting is iterative. If the output isn’t quite right, don’t just edit the result - rethink the instruction.
Clean and direct. Great for short tasks with clear goals.
You’re guiding Rocket on how to shape the result.
You’re showing Rocket what “good” looks like. It continues the pattern across your app.
Great for logic-heavy prompts, debugging, and multi-step flows.
Strategy | When to use it | What it helps with |
---|---|---|
Zero-shot | Simple, well-scoped tasks | Quick builds with minimal setup |
Instructional | You need control over layout, logic, or style | Clear, structured, and repeatable results |
Tone/Clarity | First-time UX or voice-sensitive screens | Shapes the experience to fit the audience |
Few-shot | You’ve already used a pattern you want to repeat | Maintains design consistency and flow |
Chain-of-thought | Tasks with logic, order, or dependencies | Breaks down steps for accurate execution |
Specific nouns (fields, collections, actions) reduce ambiguity and keep Rocket grounded.
Step-by-step instructions reduce skipped behavior and are easier to test.
Review this screen’s logic. What assumptions did Rocket make that aren’t valid?
Start with structure, then refine tone. Stack prompts to shape the experience.Continue exploring: